RESIDENTS WELFATE ASSOCIATION BLOCK D SEC-5 ECO CITY -1 NEW CHANDIGARH (REGD) AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP-PIL/134/2024
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010865762024
Filing Number
CWP-PIL/35763/2024
Filing Date
08-Jul-2024
Registration No
CWP-PIL/134/2024
Registration Date
10-Jul-2024
Judge
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Coram
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry
Category
13.4 - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 414 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RESIDENTS WELFATE ASSOCIATION BLOCK D SEC-5 ECO CITY -1 NEW CHANDIGARH (REGD) AND ANOTHER
Adv. AMANDEEP SINGH MANAISE
-
2.RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
-
3.RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
-
3.RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
-
4.PUNJAB POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
-
5.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
6.THE DIRECTOR/DISTRIBUTION,PSPCL
-
7.UT ADMINISTRATION,CHD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
The Chief Justice,mr. Justice Sanjiv BerryView PDF
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana issued an order in this Public Interest Litigation filed by Residents Welfare Association, Eco-City-1 against the State of Punjab and other respondents on 14.05.2026. The court directed that the detailed orders be referenced from the related case CWP-PIL-125-2024, which involved the same petitioner and respondents. The judgment was marked as speaking/reasoned and reportable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWP-PIL/134/2024
The High Court of Punjab & Haryana issued an order in this Public Interest Litigation filed by Residents Welfare Association, Eco-City-1 against the State of Punjab and other respondents on 14.05.2026. The court directed that the detailed orders be referenced from the related case CWP-PIL-125-2024, which involved the same petitioner and respondents. The judgment was marked as speaking/reasoned and reportable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts