HARDYAL SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CRM-M/33570/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,406,427,465,466,468,471,474,506 IPC. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010865632023

Filing Number

CRM-M/51551/2023

Filing Date

12-Jul-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/33570/2023

Registration Date

13-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,406,427,465,466,468,471,474,506 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARDYAL SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. KRISHAN SINGH DADWAL

  2. 2.KAMLESH KAUR @ KAMLESH RANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  3. 3.DIRECTOR BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

  4. 4.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  5. 5.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

  6. 6.GURMINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    The petitioners sought constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to reinvestigate FIR No. 240 (dated 15.9.2022) alleging theft, criminal breach of trust, and forgery, claiming they were falsely implicated based on concocted evidence. However, the court allowed withdrawal of the petition after noting that the charge-sheet had already been filed on 04.12.2023 and charges framed on 16.07.2024, permitting petitioners to pursue available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33570/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The petitioners sought constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to reinvestigate FIR No. 240 (dated 15.9.2022) alleging theft, criminal breach of trust, and forgery, claiming they were falsely implicated based on concocted evidence. However, the court allowed withdrawal of the petition after noting that the charge-sheet had already been filed on 04.12.2023 and charges framed on 16.07.2024, permitting petitioners to pursue available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case