RAMESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/14654/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010858802023
Filing Number
CWP/34747/2023
Filing Date
11-Jul-2023
Registration No
CWP/14654/2023
Registration Date
11-Jul-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Bench Type
Single
Category
68.1 - GOVT SERVICE (PB)-SB ( 771 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH KUMAR
Adv. Munish Puri
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB
-
2.CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF SOILS
-
3.DIVISIONAL SOIL CONSERVATION OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF
Case Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Ramesh Kumar's petition challenging his transfer from Gurdaspur to Bathinda. The court held that transfer is an incidence of service and employees cannot choose their posting, and found that the petitioner's earlier moves were within-district adjustments rather than actual transfers, and had already completed over three years at his posting location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jul-2023
Other
-
11-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14654/2023
Case Summary: The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Ramesh Kumar's petition challenging his transfer from Gurdaspur to Bathinda. The court held that transfer is an incidence of service and employees cannot choose their posting, and found that the petitioner's earlier moves were within-district adjustments rather than actual transfers, and had already completed over three years at his posting location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts