SHAMSHER SINGH vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR — CRA-S/1853/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010855172025

Filing Number

CRA-S/44655/2025

Filing Date

23-May-2025

Registration No

CRA-S/1853/2025

Registration Date

27-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Category

36.64-CRIMINAL APPEALS U/S 14A UNDER SC/ST ACT,1989 SEEKING REGULAR BAILS-CBI ( 1452 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAMSHER SINGH

    Adv. KRISHAN SINGH

  2. 2.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR

  2. 2.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

  3. 3.OM PARKASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Shamsher Singh's appeal and granted him regular bail after he had been in custody for over 5 years and 7 months. The court found that the appellant was not named in the FIR, was uninvolved in other cases, charges were framed only in January 2021 with only 55 prosecution witnesses examined out of 100, and further incarceration would violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Bail was granted subject to furnishing surety bonds and strict conditions including regular court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-S/1853/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed Shamsher Singh's appeal and granted him regular bail after he had been in custody for over 5 years and 7 months. The court found that the appellant was not named in the FIR, was uninvolved in other cases, charges were framed only in January 2021 with only 55 prosecution witnesses examined out of 100, and further incarceration would violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Bail was granted subject to furnishing surety bonds and strict conditions including regular court appearance, non-tampering with evidence, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case