GAWAR CONSTRUCTION LIMITED vs EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.) — CWP/17480/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Aug-2022

CNR: PHHC010849762022

Filing Number

CWP/34076/2022

Filing Date

04-Aug-2022

Registration No

CWP/17480/2022

Registration Date

06-Aug-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Bench Type

Double

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAWAR CONSTRUCTION LIMITED

    Adv. SAURABH KAPOOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.)

  2. 2.JOINT EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.DY EXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER CUM ASSESSING AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal,ms. Justice Lapita BanerjiView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana permitted Gawar Construction Limited to withdraw its petition and file an appeal before the Haryana Tax Tribunal challenging an excise and taxation order dated 31.03.2022. Since the petition had been pending for approximately 4 years while the Tribunal was non-functional, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file the statutory appeal within 4 weeks, with the State's assurance that it would not raise limitation objections if filed within this timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Aug-2022

    Other

  4. 04-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/17480/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana permitted Gawar Construction Limited to withdraw its petition and file an appeal before the Haryana Tax Tribunal challenging an excise and taxation order dated 31.03.2022. Since the petition had been pending for approximately 4 years while the Tribunal was non-functional, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file the statutory appeal within 4 weeks, with the State's assurance that it would not raise limitation objections if filed within this timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case