SONU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/27787/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010833542026

Filing Number

CRM-M/39114/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/27787/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU

    Adv. SUMIT KUMAR CHAHAL

  2. 2.SONU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SONU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving alleged heroin and ganja smuggling under the NDPS Act. The court found that the petitioner owned the motorcycle used by co-accused persons and that commercial quantity contraband was recovered, distinguishing his case from a co-accused who received bail based solely on disclosure statements. The court rejected bail based on the gravity of allegations, commercial quantity recovery, statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act, and petitioner's alleged involvement in other NDPS cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/27787/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving alleged heroin and ganja smuggling under the NDPS Act. The court found that the petitioner owned the motorcycle used by co-accused persons and that commercial quantity contraband was recovered, distinguishing his case from a co-accused who received bail based solely on disclosure statements. The court rejected bail based on the gravity of allegations, commercial quantity recovery, statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act, and petitioner's alleged involvement in other NDPS cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case