DARSHAN SINGH vs BALWINDER KAUR AND ORS — RSA/1758/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jul-2024

CNR: PHHC010831912024

Filing Number

RSA/34231/2024

Filing Date

01-Jul-2024

Registration No

RSA/1758/2024

Registration Date

12-Jul-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DARSHAN SINGH

    Adv. RAJ KUMAR KAKKAR

  2. 2.DARSHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALWINDER KAUR AND ORS

  2. 2.DARSHAN SINGH

  3. 3.INDERJIT KAUR

  4. 4.JASWINDER KAUR

  5. 5.DAVINDER KAUR

  6. 6.VARINDER KAUR

  7. 7.GURMIT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Darshan Singh's second appeal challenging the lower courts' rejection of a 1988 will allegedly executed by Kartan Singh in his favor. The court affirmed the findings that the will was forged, as handwriting and fingerprint experts found the signatures did not match, and the appellant failed to rebut this evidence or explain why he did not assert the will for 25 years after the testator's death or during a 2004 family partition he himself relied upon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1758/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Darshan Singh's second appeal challenging the lower courts' rejection of a 1988 will allegedly executed by Kartan Singh in his favor. The court affirmed the findings that the will was forged, as handwriting and fingerprint experts found the signatures did not match, and the appellant failed to rebut this evidence or explain why he did not assert the will for 25 years after the testator's death or during a 2004 family partition he himself relied upon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case