SHEELY SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/5712/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010831322026

Filing Number

CRWP/38937/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5712/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEELY SHARMA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. GARJANT SINGH

  2. 2.SHEELY SHARMA

  3. 3.DALJIT SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SHEELY SHARMA

  3. 3.DALJIT SINGH

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer) CHOLA SAHIB

  5. 5.SUNNY

  6. 6.MANOJ

  7. 7.NEETU

  8. 8.KAMLA DEVI

  9. 9.ANITA

  10. 10.NARENDRA KUMAR

  11. 11.IKKAM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted the petition of two adults in a live-in relationship seeking police protection from threats by private respondents. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran to take necessary protective steps, holding that the fundamental right to life and liberty must be protected regardless of marital status, while clarifying that protection would not shield petitioners from legal action if they commit any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5712/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted the petition of two adults in a live-in relationship seeking police protection from threats by private respondents. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran to take necessary protective steps, holding that the fundamental right to life and liberty must be protected regardless of marital status, while clarifying that protection would not shield petitioners from legal action if they commit any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case