NEELAM RANI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/5703/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010829922026

Filing Number

CRWP/38912/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5703/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEELAM RANI AND ANOTHER

    Adv. HARSIMRAN SINGH SIDHU

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.GURPREET SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.GURPREET SINGH

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) VAIROKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    CRWP-5703-2026 Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition filed by Neelam Rani and another seeking protection of life and liberty, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka (Respondent No.2) to decide their representation within 15 days by passing a reasoned order. The court further directed that the petitioners be provided requisite safety and security if required, while clarifying it made no observations on threat perception or marriage validity, leaving the independent threat assessment to the District Fazilka police authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5703/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CRWP-5703-2026 Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition filed by Neelam Rani and another seeking protection of life and liberty, directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka (Respondent No.2) to decide their representation within 15 days by passing a reasoned order. The court further directed that the petitioners be provided requisite safety and security if required, while clarifying it made no observations on threat perception or marriage validity, leaving the independent threat assessment to the District Fazilka police authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case