JASPAL SINGH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15247/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010829512026
e-Filing Number
14-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/30159/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15247/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Bench Type
Double
Category
97.21 - VIRES-ELECTION ( 864 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASPAL SINGH AND OTHERS
Adv. AMANDEEP SINGH JATTANA
-
2.Jaspal Singh And Others
-
3.Surjit Singh
-
4.Jaswinder Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.Jaspal Singh And Others
-
3.Surjit Singh
-
4.Jaswinder Singh
-
5.Deputy Commissioner
-
6.Sub Divisional Magistrate
-
7.Municipal Council Zirakpur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
Summary of CWP/15247/2026 (JASPAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitions challenging the State's Notification dated 11.05.2026, which reserved municipal wards for Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes. The Court held that while the 1972 Rules mandate ward rotation using "shall," Article 243T of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 confer discretionary power ("may") on the State, and statutory provisions prevail over subordinate rules. The Court found the government's decision to reserve wards with maximum reserved-category population was bona fide and served the reservation purpose, rejecting petitioners' mandatory rotation argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15247/2026
Summary of CWP/15247/2026 (JASPAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitions challenging the State's Notification dated 11.05.2026, which reserved municipal wards for Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes. The Court held that while the 1972 Rules mandate ward rotation using "shall," Article 243T of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 confer discretionary power ("may") on the State, and statutory provisions prevail over subordinate rules. The Court found the government's decision to reserve wards with maximum reserved-category population was bona fide and served the reservation purpose, rejecting petitioners' mandatory rotation argument. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts