POONAM RANI vs MANOJ KUMAR — TA/737/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-May-2025

CNR: PHHC010829512025

e-Filing Number

20-05-2025

Filing Number

TA/31920/2025

Filing Date

20-May-2025

Registration No

TA/737/2025

Registration Date

22-May-2025

Judge

Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

Coram

Mrs. Justice Archana Puri

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM RANI

    Adv. LUPIL GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Archana PuriView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/737/2025 - Poonam Rani v. Manoj Kumar The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Poonam Rani's application to transfer her husband's Hindu Marriage Act Section 9 petition from Family Court, Fatehabad, to the competent court at Dabwali, District Sirsa. The court found the transfer justified considering multiple pending cases at Dabwali (domestic violence and criminal proceedings), the ~100 km distance between courts, the applicant's financial hardship, and the respondent's non-appearance to contest the transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/737/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/737/2025 - Poonam Rani v. Manoj Kumar The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Poonam Rani's application to transfer her husband's Hindu Marriage Act Section 9 petition from Family Court, Fatehabad, to the competent court at Dabwali, District Sirsa. The court found the transfer justified considering multiple pending cases at Dabwali (domestic violence and criminal proceedings), the ~100 km distance between courts, the applicant's financial hardship, and the respondent's non-appearance to contest the transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case