GURMEET SINGH vs PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR — CWP/14307/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Jul-2017

CNR: PHHC010827662017

Filing Number

CWP/14307/2017

Filing Date

04-Jul-2017

Registration No

CWP/14307/2017

Registration Date

04-Jul-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.5 - LABOUR ( 452 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURMEET SINGH

    Adv. BIKRAMJIT AROURA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Gurmeet Singh's writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal's award. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision that Singh's second reference was barred because he had voluntarily withdrawn the earlier reference (which was sent to Lok Adalat for settlement negotiations) on his own volition, making a subsequent reference on the same cause of action unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Aug-2018

    Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan

  4. 17-Aug-2018

    Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri

  5. 19-Mar-2018

    Mr Justice Jaswant Singh

  6. 20-Dec-2017

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  7. 20-Dec-2017

    Mr Justice Jaswant Singh

  8. 13-Sep-2017

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  9. 13-Sep-2017

    Mr Justice Jaswant Singh

  10. 06-Jul-2017

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  11. 06-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 04-Jul-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14307/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Gurmeet Singh's writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal's award. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision that Singh's second reference was barred because he had voluntarily withdrawn the earlier reference (which was sent to Lok Adalat for settlement negotiations) on his own volition, making a subsequent reference on the same cause of action unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case