GURMEET SINGH vs PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR — CWP/14307/2017
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010827662017
Filing Number
CWP/14307/2017
Filing Date
04-Jul-2017
Registration No
CWP/14307/2017
Registration Date
04-Jul-2017
Judge
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Coram
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Bench Type
Single
Category
18.5 - LABOUR ( 452 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GURMEET SINGH
Adv. BIKRAMJIT AROURA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Gurmeet Singh's writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal's award. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision that Singh's second reference was barred because he had voluntarily withdrawn the earlier reference (which was sent to Lok Adalat for settlement negotiations) on his own volition, making a subsequent reference on the same cause of action unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Aug-2018
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
17-Aug-2018
—
Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri
-
19-Mar-2018
—
Mr Justice Jaswant Singh
-
20-Dec-2017
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
20-Dec-2017
—
Mr Justice Jaswant Singh
-
13-Sep-2017
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
13-Sep-2017
—
Mr Justice Jaswant Singh
-
06-Jul-2017
Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri
-
06-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2017
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14307/2017
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Gurmeet Singh's writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal's award. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision that Singh's second reference was barred because he had voluntarily withdrawn the earlier reference (which was sent to Lok Adalat for settlement negotiations) on his own volition, making a subsequent reference on the same cause of action unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts