POONAM AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/5682/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010827352026

Filing Number

CRWP/38756/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5682/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM AND ANOTHER

    Adv. BARJINDER SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) DIV. NO.2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP/5682/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition with directions to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (or a Deputy Commissioner of Police) to decide the petitioners' representation for protection of life and liberty within one month by passing a speaking order. The court further directed that requisite safety and security be provided to the petitioners if required, while clarifying that the police authority shall independently assess threat perception and make an autonomous decision on providing adequate security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5682/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP/5682/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition with directions to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (or a Deputy Commissioner of Police) to decide the petitioners' representation for protection of life and liberty within one month by passing a speaking order. The court further directed that requisite safety and security be provided to the petitioners if required, while clarifying that the police authority shall independently assess threat perception and make an autonomous decision on providing adequate security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case