RAMDIYA vs HARYANA SEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS — CWP/15204/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010827082026

e-Filing Number

13-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/30060/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15204/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMDIYA

    Adv. ANKUR MALIK

  2. 2.Haryana Sehri Vikas Pradhikaran and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA SEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Haryana Sehri Vikas Pradhikaran and others

  3. 3.Chief Engineer 1, Haryana Sahri Vikas Pradhikaran

  4. 4.Superintending Engineer, HSVP Circle

  5. 5.Executive Engineer, Haryana Sehri Vikas Pradhikaran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed Haryana Sehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) to hear and decide a legal notice filed by Ramdiya—a Work Supervisor (Electrical) stagnated for 22 years without promotional avenues—within three months, applying principles from the Darshna Kumari judgment on fair career progression. Both parties consented to this limited relief, and the court reserved ruling on merits regarding discrimination and regulatory amendments, instructing immediate relief if petitioner qualifies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed Haryana Sehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) to hear and decide a legal notice filed by Ramdiya—a Work Supervisor (Electrical) stagnated for 22 years without promotional avenues—within three months, applying principles from the Darshna Kumari judgment on fair career progression. Both parties consented to this limited relief, and the court reserved ruling on merits regarding discrimination and regulatory amendments, instructing immediate relief if petitioner qualifies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case