DHARMENDER AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/15224/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010826682026

e-Filing Number

13-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/30034/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15224/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDER AND OTHERS

    Adv. Anjali Bansal

  2. 2.Dharmender and others

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Sanjay Kumar

  5. 5.District Programme Officer

  6. 6.District Programme Officer

  7. 7.District Programme Officer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Dharmender and others

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Sanjay Kumar

  5. 5.District Programme Officer

  6. 6.District Programme Officer

  7. 7.District Programme Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana accepted the petitioners' request to withdraw their writ petition (CWP-15224-2026) with liberty to file fresh petitions separately. The petitioners, who sought equal pay and service regularization as contractual sand workers, were permitted to split their case into two distinct groups based on differing causes of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15224/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana accepted the petitioners' request to withdraw their writ petition (CWP-15224-2026) with liberty to file fresh petitions separately. The petitioners, who sought equal pay and service regularization as contractual sand workers, were permitted to split their case into two distinct groups based on differing causes of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case