BIKRAMJIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15164/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010826172026
e-Filing Number
13-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/30019/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15164/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Category
7 - ELECTION MATTERS ( 403 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIKRAMJIT SINGH
Adv. GAGANDEEP SINGH SIMBLE
-
2.Bikramjit Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.Bikramjit Singh
-
3.Director, Department of Local Government, Government of Punjab
-
4.Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Batala
-
5.Deputy Commissioner, Gurdaspur,
-
6.Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Electoral Registration Officer, Batala,
-
7.Tehsildar cum Assistant Electoral Registration Officer, Batala,
-
8.State Election Commissioner, Punjab
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed petitions challenging the finalized voter list for Batala Municipal Corporation elections scheduled for May 26, 2026, holding that petitioners lacked standing since they suffered no personal prejudice to their own votes. The court ruled that voter list grievances are personal to each resident and cannot be raised by third parties unless the petition qualifies as public interest litigation, which the petitioner's counsel conceded it was not. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15164/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed petitions challenging the finalized voter list for Batala Municipal Corporation elections scheduled for May 26, 2026, holding that petitioners lacked standing since they suffered no personal prejudice to their own votes. The court ruled that voter list grievances are personal to each resident and cannot be raised by third parties unless the petition qualifies as public interest litigation, which the petitioner's counsel conceded it was not. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts