SUMANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/5649/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010824272026

Filing Number

CRWP/38580/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5649/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER

    Adv. NISHANT SEHGAL

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.SSP, MOGA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.SSP, MOGA

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) SOUTH MOGA

  5. 5.TARSEM SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the SSP of Moga to examine the petitioners' representation regarding threats to their life and liberty and take appropriate protective action in accordance with law. The court affirmed that majors have a constitutional right to live with persons of their choice under Article 21, and without commenting on the legality of the petitioners' live-in relationship, disposed of the petition with protective directions while clarifying that this order does not prevent further legal proceedings against them if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5649/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the SSP of Moga to examine the petitioners' representation regarding threats to their life and liberty and take appropriate protective action in accordance with law. The court affirmed that majors have a constitutional right to live with persons of their choice under Article 21, and without commenting on the legality of the petitioners' live-in relationship, disposed of the petition with protective directions while clarifying that this order does not prevent further legal proceedings against them if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case