BALPREET KAUR AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CRWP/5662/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010823672026

Filing Number

CRWP/38589/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5662/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALPREET KAUR AND ANR

    Adv. AARJAV JAIN

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.PAWANDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP/5662/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition seeking protection of life and liberty for petitioners Balpreet Kaur and another against alleged interference by private respondents. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Hoshiarpur, to examine the petitioners' representation dated 11.05.2026 regarding threat perception and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The court clarified that this order does not express any opinion on the validity of the parties' marriage, and all parties retain the right to pursue recourse through appropriate legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5662/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP/5662/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition seeking protection of life and liberty for petitioners Balpreet Kaur and another against alleged interference by private respondents. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Hoshiarpur, to examine the petitioners' representation dated 11.05.2026 regarding threat perception and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The court clarified that this order does not express any opinion on the validity of the parties' marriage, and all parties retain the right to pursue recourse through appropriate legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case