MANPREET SINGH vs RAHUL KUMAR — CR/4104/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010822622026

Filing Number

CR/29897/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

CR/4104/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Coram

Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANPREET SINGH

    Adv. AMANDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.RAHUL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL KUMAR

  2. 2.RAHUL KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/4104/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court set aside the lower court's order striking off Manpreet Singh's defence in a Rs. 50.4 lakh recovery suit. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor found that while Singh's written statement was filed late (11.11.2025), it had actually been submitted before the striking-off order (09.04.2026) was passed, and the delay was partially attributable to pending document production proceedings. The court held that procedural rules should not override substantive justice when valuable rights are at stake, and directed the trial court to accept the already-filed written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/4104/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/4104/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court set aside the lower court's order striking off Manpreet Singh's defence in a Rs. 50.4 lakh recovery suit. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor found that while Singh's written statement was filed late (11.11.2025), it had actually been submitted before the striking-off order (09.04.2026) was passed, and the delay was partially attributable to pending document production proceedings. The court held that procedural rules should not override substantive justice when valuable rights are at stake, and directed the trial court to accept the already-filed written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case