BHOOP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/15226/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010822212026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29867/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15226/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.2 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) PENSION/RETIRAL BENEFIT ( 712 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOOP SINGH

    Adv. SANDEEP THAKAN

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Director General Treasury and Account Haryana

  4. 4.District Treasury officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-15226-2026 Bhoop Singh sought a mandamus directing the State of Haryana to re-fix his pension by granting annual increment in his last retirement year with consequential benefits and 18% p.a. interest. The court, without deciding the merits, directed the competent authority to decide the legal notice dated 11.12.2025 after providing the petitioner a personal hearing within 8 weeks, with the order to be furnished within one week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15226/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-15226-2026 Bhoop Singh sought a mandamus directing the State of Haryana to re-fix his pension by granting annual increment in his last retirement year with consequential benefits and 18% p.a. interest. The court, without deciding the merits, directed the competent authority to decide the legal notice dated 11.12.2025 after providing the petitioner a personal hearing within 8 weeks, with the order to be furnished within one week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case