RAM LAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15127/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010822132026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29855/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15127/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.5 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 467 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM LAL

    Adv. NITESH SINGLA

  2. 2.State of Punjab And Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab And Others

  3. 3.Secretary Department of Local Government Punjab

  4. 4.Accountant General

  5. 5.Director Local Government Punjab

  6. 6.Regional Deputy Director

  7. 7.Municipal Council

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Ram Lal's petition seeking arrears of revised pension with annual increments post-retirement. The court directed the competent authority (respondents 5 & 6) to treat the petition as a comprehensive representation and decide the claim within three months, in accordance with Supreme Court precedents, while affording adequate hearing and passing a reasoned order; if entitled, all consequential benefits must be granted expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Ram Lal's petition seeking arrears of revised pension with annual increments post-retirement. The court directed the competent authority (respondents 5 & 6) to treat the petition as a comprehensive representation and decide the claim within three months, in accordance with Supreme Court precedents, while affording adequate hearing and passing a reasoned order; if entitled, all consequential benefits must be granted expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case