DEEPAK LOHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/15187/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010822022026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29844/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15187/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK LOHAN

    Adv. PARDEEP KUMAR RAPRIA

  2. 2.Deepak Lohan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.Deepak Lohan

  3. 3.State Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Haryana Through its Director,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition wherein Deepak Lohan, a Commission Agent, sought directions for immediate surprise inspection of a State Warehousing Corporation warehouse and registration of a case alleging the Depot Manager demanded illegal gratification during wheat procurement. The court accepted the State's submission that the complaint had been examined by the Anti-Corruption Bureau Director and forwarded to the Superintendent of Police for consideration and appropriate action in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition wherein Deepak Lohan, a Commission Agent, sought directions for immediate surprise inspection of a State Warehousing Corporation warehouse and registration of a case alleging the Depot Manager demanded illegal gratification during wheat procurement. The court accepted the State's submission that the complaint had been examined by the Anti-Corruption Bureau Director and forwarded to the Superintendent of Police for consideration and appropriate action in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case