PARAMJEET KAUR vs AKASHDEEP SINGH — TA/662/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010822002026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

TA/29842/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

TA/662/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAMJEET KAUR

    Adv. SHRUTI MANDHOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AKASHDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/662/2026 - Paramjeet Kaur v. Akashdeep Singh Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Paramjeet Kaur's transfer application seeking to move her husband's divorce petition from Bathinda Family Court to Kharar Family Court. Key Reasoning: Justice Nidhi Gupta held that while wife's convenience is ordinarily considered in matrimonial transfer cases, each case must be examined on its facts. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying transfer: the minor daughter resides with the husband who maintains employment and single-handedly manages the child's care; the 230-240 km distance is manageable and travel only required on scheduled hearing dates; the medico-legal report showed only minor injuries; and threat allegations lacked corroborating FIR or material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/662/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/662/2026 - Paramjeet Kaur v. Akashdeep Singh Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Paramjeet Kaur's transfer application seeking to move her husband's divorce petition from Bathinda Family Court to Kharar Family Court. Key Reasoning: Justice Nidhi Gupta held that while wife's convenience is ordinarily considered in matrimonial transfer cases, each case must be examined on its facts. The court found no exceptional circumstances justifying transfer: the minor daughter resides with the husband who maintains employment and single-handedly manages the child's care; the 230-240 km distance is manageable and travel only required on scheduled hearing dates; the medico-legal report showed only minor injuries; and threat allegations lacked corroborating FIR or material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case