SAKATTAR SINGH SARPANCH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15001/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010819662026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29742/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15001/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAKATTAR SINGH SARPANCH

    Adv. ABDUL AZIZ

  2. 2.Sakattar Singh Sarpanch

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Sakattar Singh Sarpanch

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.District Development

  5. 5.Block Development

  6. 6.Shagandeep Singh

  7. 7.MANDEEP SINGH

  8. 8.VEERPAL KAUR

  9. 9.RANJIT SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/15001/2026 Court Decision: The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by directing the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Tarn Taran, to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 20.04.2026 on its merits within one month, in accordance with law and after affording due opportunity to all concerned parties. The court did not comment on the case's substantive merits but mandated expedited resolution of the petitioner's representation under the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15001/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/15001/2026 Court Decision: The Punjab & Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by directing the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Tarn Taran, to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 20.04.2026 on its merits within one month, in accordance with law and after affording due opportunity to all concerned parties. The court did not comment on the case's substantive merits but mandated expedited resolution of the petitioner's representation under the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case