DHARMBIR AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/11837/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010819532018
Filing Number
CWP/11837/2018
Filing Date
09-May-2018
Registration No
CWP/11837/2018
Registration Date
09-May-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Coram
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Bench Type
Single
Category
54 - EDUCATION(HARYANA) EXCEPT ADMISSION ( 291 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHARMBIR AND ORS
Adv. SANJIV GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition filed by Dharmbir and others against the State of Haryana as infructuous on May 14, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that supervening events had rendered the petition moot. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Nov-2018
Mr. Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa
-
22-Nov-2018
—
Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma
-
22-Oct-2018
—
Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
28-Sep-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
18-Sep-2018
Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
-
18-Sep-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
12-Sep-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
07-Sep-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
04-Sep-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
08-Aug-2018
Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
-
08-Aug-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
30-Jul-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
28-May-2018
Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
-
28-May-2018
—
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
11-May-2018
Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
-
11-May-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-May-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/11837/2018
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition filed by Dharmbir and others against the State of Haryana as infructuous on May 14, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel submitted that supervening events had rendered the petition moot. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts