PARMOD KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/15039/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010819032026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29717/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15039/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Category

58.21 - SERVICE-HARYANA POLICE ( 713 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMOD KUMAR

    Adv. MANISH SONI

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Director General of Police

  4. 4.Commissioner of Police Gurugram

  5. 5.Deputy Commissioner of Police Headquarters

  6. 6.Assistant Commissioner of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/15039/2026 Parmod Kumar challenged his premature retirement order dated 18.03.2026 (effective 17.06.2026) and an adverse Annual Confidential Report (ACR) from 2023, whose rejection of his representation was deemed time-barred. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition with a direction to the State of Haryana to decide Kumar's representation against the premature retirement and his appeal against the adverse ACR remarks within 3 weeks from receipt of the certified order copy, in accordance with law. The respondent did not object to this prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15039/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/15039/2026 Parmod Kumar challenged his premature retirement order dated 18.03.2026 (effective 17.06.2026) and an adverse Annual Confidential Report (ACR) from 2023, whose rejection of his representation was deemed time-barred. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition with a direction to the State of Haryana to decide Kumar's representation against the premature retirement and his appeal against the adverse ACR remarks within 3 weeks from receipt of the certified order copy, in accordance with law. The respondent did not object to this prayer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case