MONIKA BHATIA vs HARYANA KAUSHAL ROZGAR NIGAM LTD — CWP/15061/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010818752026
e-Filing Number
12-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29695/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15061/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Coram
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Category
20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MONIKA BHATIA
Adv. SAURABH DALAL
-
2.MONIKA BHATIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARYANA KAUSHAL ROZGAR NIGAM LTD
-
2.MONIKA BHATIA
-
3.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/15061/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Monika Bhatia's petition seeking reinstatement to service after being barred from resuming duties following an FIR registration under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Although granted bail on 18.03.2026, the respondents did not permit her to rejoin despite 17+ years of continuous service protected under the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Act, 2024. The Court directed respondents to treat the petition as a comprehensive representation and decide her claim within three months by passing a reasoned order while strictly adhering to statutory procedures and principles of natural justice, emphasizing that no employee can be kept out of service without following mandatory due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15061/2026
Case Summary: CWP/15061/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Monika Bhatia's petition seeking reinstatement to service after being barred from resuming duties following an FIR registration under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Although granted bail on 18.03.2026, the respondents did not permit her to rejoin despite 17+ years of continuous service protected under the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Act, 2024. The Court directed respondents to treat the petition as a comprehensive representation and decide her claim within three months by passing a reasoned order while strictly adhering to statutory procedures and principles of natural justice, emphasizing that no employee can be kept out of service without following mandatory due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts