SANT NISCHAL SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/15101/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010818712026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29685/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15101/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANT NISCHAL SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. AKSHAY CHADHA

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Smt Amarjit Kaur Sandhu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Smt Amarjit Kaur Sandhu

  4. 4.Assistant Collector, 2nd Grade

  5. 5.Municipal Committee, Ladwa

  6. 6.Gram Panchayat, Village Dehra

  7. 7.Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Educational Society, Ladwa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, allowing the Sant Nischal Singh Memorial Trust to pursue an appeal before the Collector challenging Mutation No.6388 (dated 18.09.2025), which had cancelled earlier mutations without notice or hearing. The State conceded that no limitation objection would be raised if the appeal was filed within ten days, and the court directed that any appeal be considered on merits with due hearing afforded to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, allowing the Sant Nischal Singh Memorial Trust to pursue an appeal before the Collector challenging Mutation No.6388 (dated 18.09.2025), which had cancelled earlier mutations without notice or hearing. The State conceded that no limitation objection would be raised if the appeal was filed within ten days, and the court directed that any appeal be considered on merits with due hearing afforded to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case