STATE BANK OF INDIA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15013/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010818342026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29671/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15013/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA

    Adv. CHANDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.State of Punjab

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab

  3. 3.District Magistrate

  4. 4.Additional District Magistrate

  5. 5.Tehsildar District

  6. 6.Senior Superintendent of Police

  7. 7.M S Shivanga Corrugators

  8. 8.M S Shivanga Corrugators

  9. 9.Gaurav Singla son of Sh Satish Kumar Singla

  10. 10.Satish Kumar Singla son of Sh Ravi Shankar

  11. 11.Santosh Rani wife of Sh Satish Kumar Singla

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed State of Punjab authorities to deliver physical possession of a secured asset to State Bank of India within 60 days. SBI sought mandamus after a 2024 ADM order directing asset possession was recalled but subsequently reinstated in January 2026, yet remained unexecuted after two years. The court disposed the petition relying on prior Division Bench precedents, ordering compliance unless legal impediments exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15013/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed State of Punjab authorities to deliver physical possession of a secured asset to State Bank of India within 60 days. SBI sought mandamus after a 2024 ADM order directing asset possession was recalled but subsequently reinstated in January 2026, yet remained unexecuted after two years. The court disposed the petition relying on prior Division Bench precedents, ordering compliance unless legal impediments exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case