RAJVINDER KAUR PRABHDEEP SINGH DHALIWAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15193/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section Article 14. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010818212026
e-Filing Number
12-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29680/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15193/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger
Category
31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJVINDER KAUR PRABHDEEP SINGH DHALIWAL
-
2.Rajvinder Kaur
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.Rajvinder Kaur
-
3.Director, Rural Development and Panchayats Department, Punjab
-
4.District Development and Panchayat Officer, District Patiala, Punjab
-
5.Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Bhunerheri, District Patiala, Punjab
-
6.Tehsildar, Dudhan Sadhan, District Patiala, Punjab
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Rajvinder Kaur's writ petition challenging a notice dated 30.04.2026 issued by the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Patiala. The court held that writ petitions are not maintainable against show-cause notices unless the issuing authority lacks jurisdiction, and the petitioner should instead respond to the notice and pursue appellate remedies if adversely affected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15193/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Rajvinder Kaur's writ petition challenging a notice dated 30.04.2026 issued by the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Patiala. The court held that writ petitions are not maintainable against show-cause notices unless the issuing authority lacks jurisdiction, and the petitioner should instead respond to the notice and pursue appellate remedies if adversely affected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts