MAHINDRO DEVI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/15055/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010818082026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29694/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15055/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHINDRO DEVI AND OTHERS

    Adv. DHARAMVIR DHINDSA

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

  3. 3.Director General

  4. 4.Smt Champa Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and Others

  3. 3.Director General

  4. 4.Smt Champa Devi

  5. 5.Sub Divisional Officer

  6. 6.Block Development and Panchayat Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the writ petition seeking mandamus to finalize the appointment of Acting Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Budhakhera, Naraingarh, Ambala after the State submitted that a formal meeting for the appointment had been scheduled for 20.05.2026 with appropriate action to follow. Finding the State's submission satisfactory, the court declined to pass further orders and closed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15055/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the writ petition seeking mandamus to finalize the appointment of Acting Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Budhakhera, Naraingarh, Ambala after the State submitted that a formal meeting for the appointment had been scheduled for 20.05.2026 with appropriate action to follow. Finding the State's submission satisfactory, the court declined to pass further orders and closed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case