GURDIP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/15105/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010817022026
e-Filing Number
11-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29625/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15105/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Coram
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GURDIP SINGH
Adv. NITESH SINGLA
-
2.Gurdip Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.Gurdip Singh
-
3.The Director Local Government Department
-
4.Director Fire and Emergency Service, Punjab
-
5.The Additional Deputy Commissioner
-
6.The Executive Officer
-
7.Shri Navjot Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF
Case Summary: CWP-15105-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Gurdip Singh's petition challenging an alleged arbitrary transfer of another Fire Driver-cum-Operator to the overstaffed Rampura Phul Fire Brigade (7 employees against 4 sanctioned posts). The court directed the competent authority to hear and decide the petitioner's representation dated 13.04.2026 within three months by passing a reasoned, speaking order, without adjudicating the petition's merits. The respondent authority accepted this direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15105/2026
Case Summary: CWP-15105-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Gurdip Singh's petition challenging an alleged arbitrary transfer of another Fire Driver-cum-Operator to the overstaffed Rampura Phul Fire Brigade (7 employees against 4 sanctioned posts). The court directed the competent authority to hear and decide the petitioner's representation dated 13.04.2026 within three months by passing a reasoned, speaking order, without adjudicating the petition's merits. The respondent authority accepted this direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts