RAM DHAN PANDHIR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/13967/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Jul-2023

CNR: PHHC010816162023

Filing Number

CWP/32870/2023

Filing Date

03-Jul-2023

Registration No

CWP/13967/2023

Registration Date

04-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.12 - SCOSB (HARYANA) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 454 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM DHAN PANDHIR

    Adv. GUNJAN MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Summary of CWP-13967-2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Ram Dhan Pandir's writ petition seeking 12% interest on delayed retiral benefits (Rs.15,89,061). The court found that during the petition's pendency, the petitioner had already appealed to the State, which granted interest at 7.1% per annum (GPF rate) via order dated 13.06.2025, and Rs.3,50,210 had been released. The court held no further adjudication was warranted, but permitted the petitioner to pursue additional remedies if dissatisfied with the interest quantum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jul-2023

    Other

  4. 03-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/13967/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-13967-2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Ram Dhan Pandir's writ petition seeking 12% interest on delayed retiral benefits (Rs.15,89,061). The court found that during the petition's pendency, the petitioner had already appealed to the State, which granted interest at 7.1% per annum (GPF rate) via order dated 13.06.2025, and Rs.3,50,210 had been released. The court held no further adjudication was warranted, but permitted the petitioner to pursue additional remedies if dissatisfied with the interest quantum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case