SUNNY KANT @ SUNNY vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/27248/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010814812026

Filing Number

CRM-M/38137/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/27248/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNNY KANT @ SUNNY

    Adv. S.S. NAIN

  2. 2.SUNNY KANT @ SUNNY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SUNNY KANT @ SUNNY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/27248/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Sunny Kant's petition for interim bail. The court rejected his request for 10 days' release to perform "barsi" (death anniversary) rituals for his deceased mother (May 17-25, 2026), citing serious murder allegations against him and the advanced stage of trial proceedings. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging the petitioner's previous compliance with bail conditions and the trial being near completion (19 of 26 prosecution witnesses examined), Justice Sumeet Goel found the gravity of charges—killing Manish Bhardwaj by gunshot—and risk of absconding outweighed the religious obligation justification, despite the petitioner being the only male family member required for the ceremony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/27248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/27248/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Sunny Kant's petition for interim bail. The court rejected his request for 10 days' release to perform "barsi" (death anniversary) rituals for his deceased mother (May 17-25, 2026), citing serious murder allegations against him and the advanced stage of trial proceedings. Key Reasoning: While acknowledging the petitioner's previous compliance with bail conditions and the trial being near completion (19 of 26 prosecution witnesses examined), Justice Sumeet Goel found the gravity of charges—killing Manish Bhardwaj by gunshot—and risk of absconding outweighed the religious obligation justification, despite the petitioner being the only male family member required for the ceremony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case