TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. vs REKHA GUPTA AND OTHERS — FAO/5427/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010814142023
Filing Number
FAO/32772/2023
Filing Date
01-Jul-2023
Registration No
FAO/5427/2023
Registration Date
30-Sep-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
Coram
Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.12 - TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE ( 878 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Adv. PUNIT JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.REKHA GUPTA AND OTHERS
-
2.DEVANSH GUPTA MINOR
-
3.LOVISHA GUPTA
-
4.VANSHIKA
-
5.RITIKA SINGLA
-
6.GURWINDER SINGH
-
7.MAKHAN SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF
Summary of FAO/5427/2023 - TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rekha Gupta The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed both cross-appeals in a motor accident death compensation case, increasing the total award from ₹50,82,600 to ₹54,60,500 (₹3,78,000 enhancement) by recalculating the deceased's income at ₹6,78,600 annually after deducting actual income tax liability, and including medical and transportation expenses. The court upheld the tribunal's findings on liability and negligence while modifying the compensation quantum based on proper averaging of tax returns and applicable Supreme Court principles for dependency calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/5427/2023
Summary of FAO/5427/2023 - TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Rekha Gupta The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed both cross-appeals in a motor accident death compensation case, increasing the total award from ₹50,82,600 to ₹54,60,500 (₹3,78,000 enhancement) by recalculating the deceased's income at ₹6,78,600 annually after deducting actual income tax liability, and including medical and transportation expenses. The court upheld the tribunal's findings on liability and negligence while modifying the compensation quantum based on proper averaging of tax returns and applicable Supreme Court principles for dependency calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts