BALBIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR — CWP/15175/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010812212026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29507/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15175/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALBIR SINGH

    Adv. R S MAMLI

  2. 2.Balbir singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

  2. 2.Balbir singh

  3. 3.Managing Director,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/15175/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Balbir Singh's writ petition seeking regularization and consequential benefits by directing the competent authority (Respondent No.2) to decide his representation dated 21.04.2026 within three months, passing a reasoned order following Supreme Court guidelines in Madan Singh. The court noted both respondents had no objection to this limited relief and clarified that if the petitioner is found entitled, relief should be granted immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/15175/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Balbir Singh's writ petition seeking regularization and consequential benefits by directing the competent authority (Respondent No.2) to decide his representation dated 21.04.2026 within three months, passing a reasoned order following Supreme Court guidelines in Madan Singh. The court noted both respondents had no objection to this limited relief and clarified that if the petitioner is found entitled, relief should be granted immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case