BINNY AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/15118/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010812032026
e-Filing Number
11-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29493/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/15118/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Namit Kumar
Category
68.1 - GOVT SERVICE (PB)-SB ( 771 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BINNY AND ORS
Adv. PARVESH SAINI
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
-
3.RICHA
-
4.JASKARANDEEP KAUR
-
5.DIRECTOR, HEALTH FAMILY WELFARE, PUNJAB
-
6.ARTI THAKUR
-
7.SAKSHAM BAJAJ
-
8.RAJVINDER KAUR
-
9.PRABHJOT KAUR
-
10.KAMALDEEP KAUR
-
11.BALDEEP KAUR
-
12.KAMALJOT KAUR
-
13.ARSHDEEP KAUR
-
14.AMANDEEP KAUR
-
15.PRAMOD KUMAR
-
16.HAROON
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
-
3.RICHA
-
4.JASKARANDEEP KAUR
-
5.DIRECTOR, HEALTH FAMILY WELFARE, PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by directing the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' justice demand notice (dated 18.03.2026) regarding statutory pay scale entitlements for Staff Nurses within six months, after providing them a hearing and passing a reasoned order. The court did not adjudicate the merits but relied on the State's counsel's consent to this interim direction, with the State to communicate its decision to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/15118/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition by directing the State of Punjab to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioners' justice demand notice (dated 18.03.2026) regarding statutory pay scale entitlements for Staff Nurses within six months, after providing them a hearing and passing a reasoned order. The court did not adjudicate the merits but relied on the State's counsel's consent to this interim direction, with the State to communicate its decision to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts