AMARAWATI vs KULDEEP KUMAR — TA/657/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010811792026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

TA/29469/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

TA/657/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMARAWATI

    Adv. Ritesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/657/2026 Amarawati v. Kuldeep Kumar | High Court of Punjab and Haryana | 14.05.2026 The court dismissed Amarawati's transfer application seeking to move her husband's Hindu Marriage Act petition from Fatehabad (Haryana) to Jalandhar (Punjab). Though the wife argued hardship due to 250km distance, unemployment, and lack of male family support, the court found transfer unjustified because the employed respondent-husband would face greater difficulty traveling to Jalandhar and had not appeared in related proceedings, contrary to established precedent favoring wives' transfer pleas in matrimonial cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/657/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/657/2026 Amarawati v. Kuldeep Kumar | High Court of Punjab and Haryana | 14.05.2026 The court dismissed Amarawati's transfer application seeking to move her husband's Hindu Marriage Act petition from Fatehabad (Haryana) to Jalandhar (Punjab). Though the wife argued hardship due to 250km distance, unemployment, and lack of male family support, the court found transfer unjustified because the employed respondent-husband would face greater difficulty traveling to Jalandhar and had not appeared in related proceedings, contrary to established precedent favoring wives' transfer pleas in matrimonial cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case