NITA NAND vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT — CWP/15010/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010811742026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29462/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15010/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITA NAND

    Adv. BHUWNESH LAKHERA

  2. 2.State of Haryana through principal secretary, Revenue Department

  3. 3.Nirmal Garg

  4. 4.Himanshu Garg

  5. 5.Ankur Aggarwal

  6. 6.Sumit

  7. 7.Anita

  8. 8.Indra rani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT

  2. 2.State of Haryana through principal secretary, Revenue Department

  3. 3.Nirmal Garg

  4. 4.Himanshu Garg

  5. 5.Ankur Aggarwal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the petition seeking a mandamus to direct the Commissioner, Gurugram Division, to decide a pending revision petition (ER/013/2025) expeditiously. The court accepted the State's submission that the Divisional Commissioner would make earnest efforts to decide the revision petition in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15010/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the petition seeking a mandamus to direct the Commissioner, Gurugram Division, to decide a pending revision petition (ER/013/2025) expeditiously. The court accepted the State's submission that the Divisional Commissioner would make earnest efforts to decide the revision petition in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case