AMANDEEP GILL vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/15160/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010811712026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29454/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/15160/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda

Category

4.8 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ( 364 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMANDEEP GILL

    Adv. RAKHI SHARMA

  2. 2.Union of India and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Union of India and others

  3. 3.The general manager northern railway

  4. 4.Senior division personnel officer northern railway ambala cantt

  5. 5.Station superintendent Northern railway bathinda

  6. 6.Sh kamlesh kumar meena wellfare officer northern railway bathinda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Amandeep Gill's petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of his compassionate appointment claim. The court found that civil proceedings established Gill was the grandson (not son) of David Gill's wife from her previous marriage, and rejected his claim as fraudulent for misrepresenting his relationship to the deceased employee despite adverse civil court findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/15160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Amandeep Gill's petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of his compassionate appointment claim. The court found that civil proceedings established Gill was the grandson (not son) of David Gill's wife from her previous marriage, and rejected his claim as fraudulent for misrepresenting his relationship to the deceased employee despite adverse civil court findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case