JAGPAL vs MAMTA SINGH, IPS — COCP/2370/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010810852026

Filing Number

COCP/29425/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

COCP/2370/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGPAL

    Adv. GEETA BANSAL

  2. 2.MAMTA SINGH, IPS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMTA SINGH, IPS

  2. 2.MAMTA SINGH, IPS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/2370/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jagpal's contempt petition against Ms. Mamta Singh, IPS, finding no breach of court order as the prior order contained no specific enforceable directive. The court held the contempt petition constituted frivolous and vexatious litigation and a gross abuse of judicial process. Key Reasoning: The court found the petitioner had no valid grounds for contempt proceedings despite knowing the legal position, and that Ms. Mamta Singh had actually complied with prior court directions and was performing duties effectively. The court imposed exemplary costs of ₹10,000 on the petitioner as a deterrent against frivolous litigation, to be paid to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/2370/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/2370/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jagpal's contempt petition against Ms. Mamta Singh, IPS, finding no breach of court order as the prior order contained no specific enforceable directive. The court held the contempt petition constituted frivolous and vexatious litigation and a gross abuse of judicial process. Key Reasoning: The court found the petitioner had no valid grounds for contempt proceedings despite knowing the legal position, and that Ms. Mamta Singh had actually complied with prior court directions and was performing duties effectively. The court imposed exemplary costs of ₹10,000 on the petitioner as a deterrent against frivolous litigation, to be paid to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case