PARDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/27830/2025
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010810832025
Filing Number
CRM-M/42417/2025
Filing Date
19-May-2025
Registration No
CRM-M/27830/2025
Registration Date
19-May-2025
Judge
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Coram
Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARDEEP SINGH
Adv. RAJESH GOYAL
-
2.PARDEEP SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M/27830/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Pardeep Singh, accused of NDPS Act violations for possession of 34 kg of ganja, based on his prolonged incarceration of approximately 20 months and the slow pace of trial with no prosecution witnesses examined yet out of 23. The court held that trial delay and extended detention, coupled with Section 436-A CrPC protections, override the Section 37 NDPS Act embargo on bail, provided Singh appears regularly in court and complies with specified conditions including surrender of passport and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/27830/2025
Case Summary: CRM-M/27830/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Pardeep Singh, accused of NDPS Act violations for possession of 34 kg of ganja, based on his prolonged incarceration of approximately 20 months and the slow pace of trial with no prosecution witnesses examined yet out of 23. The court held that trial delay and extended detention, coupled with Section 436-A CrPC protections, override the Section 37 NDPS Act embargo on bail, provided Singh appears regularly in court and complies with specified conditions including surrender of passport and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts