NAND LAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRA-AS/84/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010810132026

Filing Number

CRA-AS/37903/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRA-AS/84/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Category

36.2 - ACQUITTAL APPEAL ( 244 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAND LAL

    Adv. DAMANJEET BHORIWAL

  2. 2.NAND LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.NAND LAL

  3. 3.BHUPINDER KAUR

  4. 4.HARBIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    Summary of CRA-AS/84/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal challenging the acquittal of Bhupinder Kaur and Harbir Singh in a caste-based atrocity case filed by complainant Nand Lal. The court found the prosecution's case unreliable, citing doubtful presence of witnesses at the incident location, unexplained three-day delay in filing the complaint despite the alleged occurrence in a public court complex, and the fact that the sole named eyewitness (Sukhmander Singh) refuted the allegations. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding no prosecutorial evidence sufficient to prove charges under the Scheduled Castes/Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA-AS/84/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRA-AS/84/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal challenging the acquittal of Bhupinder Kaur and Harbir Singh in a caste-based atrocity case filed by complainant Nand Lal. The court found the prosecution's case unreliable, citing doubtful presence of witnesses at the incident location, unexplained three-day delay in filing the complaint despite the alleged occurrence in a public court complex, and the fact that the sole named eyewitness (Sukhmander Singh) refuted the allegations. The court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding no prosecutorial evidence sufficient to prove charges under the Scheduled Castes/Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case