AKASH INFRASTRUCTURE vs STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, PUNJAB — CWP/14873/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010810012026
e-Filing Number
08-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29359/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14873/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor
Coram
Justice (To Be Nominated) , Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor
Category
18.13 - MINES AND MINERALS ( 450 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKASH INFRASTRUCTURE
Adv. HARSH VASU GUPTA
-
2.Akash Infrastructure
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, PUNJAB
-
2.Akash Infrastructure
-
3.Superintending Engineer, Ropar, Drainage cum Mining and Geology Circle
-
4.Executive Engineer, Shri Anandpur Sahib, Drainage cum Mining Division
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Justice (To Be Nominated),mr. Justice Rohit KapoorView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Akash Infrastructure's writ petition, finding the controversy identical to a previously decided case (CWP-22658-2025). The court quashed the impugned demand notices and orders but permitted the State of Punjab to proceed afresh by following proper procedure for determining royalty violations, issuing fresh notices specifying violations with reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14873/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Akash Infrastructure's writ petition, finding the controversy identical to a previously decided case (CWP-22658-2025). The court quashed the impugned demand notices and orders but permitted the State of Punjab to proceed afresh by following proper procedure for determining royalty violations, issuing fresh notices specifying violations with reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts