MS GO LIVE vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14908/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010809522026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29351/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14908/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS GO LIVE

    Adv. VIKRAM SINGH

  2. 2.Ms Go Live

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.Ms Go Live

  3. 3.Director, Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Haryana

  4. 4.Municipal Corporation, Gurugram

  5. 5.Deputy Town Planner, Municipal Corporation

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the Municipal Corporation, Gurugram's counsel undertook to consider the petitioner's two Outdoor Media Display applications (submitted on 21.12.2024 and 25.08.2025) and pass an appropriate reasoned order within 30 days in accordance with the Haryana Municipal Advertisement Bye-Laws, 2022, after affording due hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14908/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the Municipal Corporation, Gurugram's counsel undertook to consider the petitioner's two Outdoor Media Display applications (submitted on 21.12.2024 and 25.08.2025) and pass an appropriate reasoned order within 30 days in accordance with the Haryana Municipal Advertisement Bye-Laws, 2022, after affording due hearing to all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case