RANDHIR SINGH MALIK vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER — CWP/14933/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010809342026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29333/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14933/2026

Registration Date

12-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Category

58.1 - GOVT SERVICE (HY) ( 705 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANDHIR SINGH MALIK

    Adv. Sandeep Kumar Goyat

  2. 2.Randhir Singh Malik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER

  2. 2.Randhir Singh Malik

  3. 3.Director, Local Audit, Haryana

  4. 4.Principal Accountant General A and E

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14933/2026 Randhir Singh Malik sought mandamus to claim Senior Auditor grade pay (Rs.9300-34800+4600) with 12% interest from July 2004-2009 for approximately five years of stop-gap arrangement work. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director, Local Audit, Haryana to decide the petitioner's representation dated 31.03.2025 within eight weeks after providing personal hearing, without prejudging merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14933/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14933/2026 Randhir Singh Malik sought mandamus to claim Senior Auditor grade pay (Rs.9300-34800+4600) with 12% interest from July 2004-2009 for approximately five years of stop-gap arrangement work. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the Director, Local Audit, Haryana to decide the petitioner's representation dated 31.03.2025 within eight weeks after providing personal hearing, without prejudging merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case