PRACHI DUREJA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/14890/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010809292026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/29327/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/14890/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRACHI DUREJA

    Adv. SAKSHAM MAHAJAN

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.Civil Hospital, Poly Clinic, Sector 31, Gurugram

  4. 4.Competent Authority Civil Surgeon

  5. 5.Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, through its Secretary

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/14890/2026 Prachi Dureja petitioned the High Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking a disability certificate under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, claiming 60% disability. The State Counsel assured the court that the petitioner would be called for medical examination by a Board of Doctors, which would issue the requisite certificate within two weeks if she complies. Justice Jagmohan Bansal disposed of the petition, accepting the State's commitment to complete the examination process within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/14890/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/14890/2026 Prachi Dureja petitioned the High Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking a disability certificate under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, claiming 60% disability. The State Counsel assured the court that the petitioner would be called for medical examination by a Board of Doctors, which would issue the requisite certificate within two weeks if she complies. Justice Jagmohan Bansal disposed of the petition, accepting the State's commitment to complete the examination process within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case