SURESH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/5631/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010807942026

Filing Number

CRWP/37789/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/5631/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. VISHNEET SINGH

  2. 2.SURESH

  3. 3.POOJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SURESH

  3. 3.POOJA

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) BHAVWALA, FAZILKA

  5. 5.ROOPARAM

  6. 6.VIKRAM KUMAR

  7. 7.SUNITA

  8. 8.SANDEEP KUMAR

  9. 9.MOTI RAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection to two adults in a live-in relationship who faced threats from private respondents, directing them to approach the Nodal Officer under Punjab's January 2025 notification for such cases. The court held that the fundamental right to life and liberty must be protected even without marriage, though it required age verification of petitioner No.2 (Pooja) through proper documents beyond the Aadhar Card, and clarified the protection does not shield either party from lawful action for any offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/5631/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection to two adults in a live-in relationship who faced threats from private respondents, directing them to approach the Nodal Officer under Punjab's January 2025 notification for such cases. The court held that the fundamental right to life and liberty must be protected even without marriage, though it required age verification of petitioner No.2 (Pooja) through proper documents beyond the Aadhar Card, and clarified the protection does not shield either party from lawful action for any offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case