UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs A RAJESEKHAR REDDY AND ANOTHER — CWP/14853/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010806652026
e-Filing Number
08-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/29240/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/14853/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Category
4.11 - ORDERS AGAINST ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL(CIVIL) ( 328 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Adv. BHAVANA DATTA
-
2.Union of India and Others
-
3.Officer in Charge pay and accounts office
-
4.Officer in Charge pay and accounts office
Respondent(s)
-
1.A RAJESEKHAR REDDY AND ANOTHER
-
2.Union of India and Others
-
3.Officer in Charge pay and accounts office
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the Union of India's petition without pressing it further, noting that the underlying Armed Forces Tribunal order was seven years old and based on settled precedent in Kultar Singh Chauhan v. Union of India. The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/14853/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the Union of India's petition without pressing it further, noting that the underlying Armed Forces Tribunal order was seven years old and based on settled precedent in Kultar Singh Chauhan v. Union of India. The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts