MANPREET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/26859/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010806122026

Filing Number

CRM-M/37724/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26859/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANPREET SINGH

    Adv. RAJVEER SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/26859/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Manpreet Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged group assault on a complainant with weapons (sword, iron kappa, khanda) on April 11, 2026. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj found prima facie evidence of the petitioner's complicity, ruled the allegations serious in nature, and determined that custodial interrogation during the investigation's initial stage was essential, making anticipatory bail inappropriate despite the petitioner's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26859/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/26859/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Manpreet Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged group assault on a complainant with weapons (sword, iron kappa, khanda) on April 11, 2026. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj found prima facie evidence of the petitioner's complicity, ruled the allegations serious in nature, and determined that custodial interrogation during the investigation's initial stage was essential, making anticipatory bail inappropriate despite the petitioner's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case